6/20/2023 0 Comments Intel new gpuAny SERIOUS resource money stopped after 圆4 extensions were added to x86)Xeon Phi and Itanium were niche products anyway. (Yes yes, I know Itanium had a long life considering, but Intel pretty much admitted defeat after adding 圆4 extensions by AMD. Larrabee/Knights Corner, Itanium, and XPoint come to mind. ![]() Intel is unproven in the field of long term support on hardware ventures. The memory bandwidth, in particular, is poor compared to Nvidia cards - the 1660 Ti and 3050 manage 288 and 224 GB/s respectively - while the power draw is low compared to the two Nvidia cards’ pull of 120 and 130W.ĭigitalgriffin said:It has to be <$200 to be viable. The full specs of the A380 card tested are 128 compute units capable of processing 1,024 threads and running at 2.45 GHz, 16 tensor cores, 6GB of GDDR6 with a bandwidth of 192 GB/s, 32 render output units, 64 texture mappers, and a power draw of just 75W. ![]() We have yet to see how the A500 and A700 will compare to these cards, but we can be sure that they will beat the entry-level A380. Some of this falls at the door of the A380’s lack of support for FP64 double-precision floating point math, though it makes up for it with tensor cores used for matrix multiplication and lower precision work. The A380 regularly comes in third place in SiSoftware’s tests, beaten by cards such as the GTX 1660Ti, and RX 6500 XT, putting it in roughly the same place as an earlier leak (opens in new tab) that placed the A380 neck-and-neck with the GTX 1650 Super, as well as one that saw it beaten by an RTX 3070 (opens in new tab) in OpenCL. ![]() ![]() In addition, the review was conducted under Windows 10, looking at things like hashing, cryptographic analysis, and image processing rather than measuring DirectX performance in gaming. SiSoftware has yet to review the other cards in the family, and it’s worth noting that the A380 review is an OpenCL review.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |